Sunday, June 26, 2011

The Root Cause of "Domestic Violence" is... Women are Wh*res???

So a cop in Florida has developed an iPhone app called "CATE" - Call And Text Eraser. Installed on one's phone, it allows one to carry on adulterous relationships without fear of getting caught by erasing all calls and texts on the phone from certain numbers.

"I had a good friend of mine who went through a divorce because his wife was finding things on his phone. It intercepts call and text messages from people on your lists and stores it within the app."

But then, Immler, the cop who is the inventor of the app, reveals something that says too much by half....

"Immler begs to differ (with those who say his app is an indirect condonation of adultery). He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone."

Now, think about that....

The typical femtard mythology on "domestic violence" (I use quotation marks because, as I have revealed in other posts, the whole concept of domestic violence is fake.) is that men, who are controlled by some evil chemical called "testosterone" and who have been reared to respect violence and non-cooperation as lifestyle choices (after all, men watch football and are competitive... shudder!) and whom society has taught to hate women (because, of course, women are merely nonsentient beings to be controlled and objectified for sexual purposes by the patriarchy!), rise up in all the evolutionary power of their superior strength and beat women senseless for no reason whatsoever.

Now, of course, this mythology doesn't take into account that lawyers who are defending those accused of "domestic violence" across the United States, at least, immediately ask their clients to come up with a list of instances in which the wife (and it is always the wife making the allegation of "domestic violence," isn't it?) was "controlling" or in which the husband/defendant failed to be "controlling," because, as they say in the jurisdictions in which I have knowledge, "All domestic violence proceedings are about 'control,' never about 'violence.'"

But the main point of the mythology, of course, is that women are sainted victims of evil. Evil has been brought about on them by men, the patriarchy, even biology itself (thank God/goddess/Gaia for abortion!). But women are as pure and unsullied as the wind driven snow, and didn't do anything to bring about "domestic violence" (whether that is defined as assault - which it isn't - or merely refusing to give a woman her way - which it is).

But here is an amazing thing. The cop who designed the app says he designed it to deter "domestic violence" (however you define that) because it is prone to happen... when adultery is at issue?

Let's read it again....

"Immler begs to differ (with those who say his app is an indirect condonation of adultery). He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone."

Now waitaminnit... lemme get this straight. Women file 98% of all "domestic violence" (however you define that) claims in the United States. Yet Barney Fife/App Developer here says that "domestic violence" (however you define that) is sparked by the discovery that a spouse is cheating?

So DV (however you define that) is something uniquely complained of by women. DV (however you define that) occurs, according to Mr. Adam 12, when complainants are discovered in adultery. So it must be that women are somehow uniquely related to adultery...?

Ergo, the reason "domestic violence" (however you define that) takes place is: Women are Whores.

Oddly, the story itself dds further fuel to this suspicion when it notes that this app, which is designed to help one cover one's tracks while committing adultery... is primarily downloaded by women!

I think we have stumbled upon a very important solution to the "domestic violence" (however you define that) problem in this country! If women would quit being such irredeemable and committed whores, "domestic violence" (however you define that) would go away!

Let's see if feminists are really interested in wiping out "domestic violence" (however you define that), or if they just want to keep the funding that flows from all the false allegations of "domestic violence" (however you define that).

I think I know how this story ends.


Original story from

by Rochelle Ritchie

It comes in the form of an app on your cell phone that can hide who you've been texting and calling.

The app, called "CATE," hit the Android market last week and is already getting rave reviews. But one divorce attorney says the app may keep your secrets secret, but not for long.

CATE stands for "call and text eraser" which is exactly what it does. The app erases any opportunity for your significant other to find out who you've been in contact with.

Phillip Immler is a cop who is also in law school. He created the app after a friend's phone was hacked by his spouse.

"I had a good friend of mine who went through a divorce because his wife was finding things on his phone. It intercepts call and text messages from people on your lists and stores it within the app," says Immler.

Only the app owner has the passcode to unlock the contacts he or she decides should be hidden from view. There's already buzz over the app online.

Divorce attorney Robin Roshkind says while the app may promise to hide your infidelity, it won't stop a determined woman or man wanting to know the truth.

"If there is going to be an app to stop all this, trust me, we still have our ways, a good old fashioned private investigator. It's a little ironic it was an officer of the law that came up with this app," says Roshkind.

But Immler begs to differ. He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone.

So far "CATE" has been downloaded more than 20 times in its first week at $2.99 a pop.

Despite the purpose of his app, Immler insists, "I don't condone cheating, no."

Immler says more women have purchased the app than men.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Feminism's Witch Hunt - 2011 Style

Monday, June 13, 2011

Defund Feminism (#DEFUNDFEMINISM)


The House Republican Caucus is requesting the guidance of Americans to help the Republican leadership settle on cuts to make as the House wends its way through the process of proposing a reasonable federal budget. In a program called YouCut, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is asking voters to register their approval of certain already-proposed changes, but also is giving voters the opportunity to "Submit Your Idea." By clicking this button, you can make suggestions of cuts that ought to be made, but may not have been suggested yet.

Several things are necessarily true....

1) Feminism in America could not exist without federal funding. NOBODY cares enough about the serial drivel and prepubescent nonsense engaged in by feminists to actually reach into their wallet and fund it. This is why federal grants - under the rubric of "law enforcement" or "education," for instance - are absolutely vital for keeping feminism alive and viable in the United States.

2) Feminism contributes absolutely nothing positive to the American culture or economy.

3) In fact, feminism actively undermines both the American culture and the economy. Its pro-abortion dogma has eliminated the greatest part of two generations of taxpayers, leaving programs such as Social Security and Medicare in the lurch. Its false allegations industry serves only to tie up courts and law enforcement with meaningless political charges, while actively undermining the one thing that has been proven to protect women and children - the family. Its academic endeavors [sic] are widely recognized as being a pablum only slightly more complex than the normal fare of the retarded. Its legal theories, besides encouraging false allegations of rape, domestic violence, sexual harassment, and abuse, serve only to destroy business, culture, the military, the professions, and the public good by making irrelevancies out to be real issues ("diversity," "sexual harassment," "women's perspective") and by placing, en masse, unqualified people into positions of responsibility based merely upon their gender.

And yet, billions of dollars per year flow from both the federal and state governments to sustain feminist political programs that serve no recognizable public good other than funding lawyers and further feminist programs.

These are the undeniable facts. Feminism helps nothing, hurts everything, and would simply cease to exist if taxpayers were not strongarmed into keeping feminism alive through the distribution of taxes to feminist organizations by governments.

This being the case, it is time for those who stand with unborn children, the family, business, the culture, legitimate education, justice, and legitimate law enforcement to strike while the iron is hot. For the next few years, Congress will (theoretically) be seeking to make all kinds of cuts just to keep the American ship afloat.

It is thus time for the most malignant tumor in the history of the American experiment to be excised.

It is time to totally, completely, and finally DEFUND FEMINISM.

Please surf over to YouCut, and after voting for the various items for which your vote is solicited, find the "SUBMIT YOUR IDEAS" button at the bottom of the page. Then, fill in the dialog box with your request that ALL feminism in the United States be defunded at the federal level.

I wrote the following in my request:

"I would like to request that ALL feminist political organizations and activities, from Planned Parenthood to women's shelters to feminist studies and women's studies programs in universities, be completely defunded by the federal government.

These are wholly destructive organizations which exist only to consume the hard-earned resources of working Americans while undermining the values and culture that is respected by the American majority.

Further, these are political organizations, and cannot and should not be funded by the taxes of those who disagree with their political policies."

Feel free to swipe my note, modify it, or write your own. Or, if you have a flair for the pithy and dramatic, perhaps you will simply write...


It is time to draw a line in the sand, and excise the most destructive political movement in the history of the United States. Join me in asking Congress to DEFUND FEMINISM, and please send your friends to this page to join the fight.

So You Think You Know What Feminism Is About?

You are delusional or stupid or dishonest if you maintain that feminism is about:

1) Equality.
2) The protection of women.
3) Proper care for children.
4) A stronger, more vibrant society.

Rather, feminism is about:

1) Socialism.
2) The destruction of marriage.
3) The wholesale slaughter of children.
4) The hatred of men.
5) Covetousness.
6) Placing women, children, men, and all of society at risk.

Read the quotes below. Enjoy.

Oh, and I truly AM sorry that nobody has told you the truth prior to now.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Women Want It Every Which Way

So, let me get this straight....

If Daddy DOESN'T hug and kiss his little femtard as a child, then his little femtard grows up psychotic, histrionic and depressed because he was "a stranger" and "emotionally distant."

If Daddy DOES hug and kiss his little femtard as a child, then he has "sexualized" his relationship with her.

So Dads, write this down! Hug and kiss your little femtard, but DON'T!

Got it?

You perv....

Monday, June 6, 2011

Weiner Dicks Around - Anthony's Sexual Harassment Escapades

So Anthony Weiner is a bit of a prick. A dick. A... wiener. That much is obvious.

What may not be so obvious is that he is also guilty of sexual harassment.

What is even less obvious is why femtards will be ignoring this fact.

"Sexual Harassment," which Susan Brownmiller admits was a made-up offense designed to make femtard protest posters pithy, witty, and memorable, is nevertheless a fake offense (like "domestic violence") that can cost a man just about everything.

I will never forget living through the Clinton impeachment and speaking to a woman who took great offense at the stories of Clinton semi-boinking the interns while biting the lips of more mature visitors and fathering multiracial children thither and yon. When I asked, "What is it that makes you so upset about this?", she replied, "You can't tell me that if this were the CEO of General Electric the feminists would be all over him screaming 'sexual harassment!' 'Sexual harassment!' 'Sexual harassment!'"

And of course, she was right about that. But we have all known forever that hypocrisy and irrationality are the only two things that feminism has in abundant supply. Oh, and grievance. But anyway....

So I have thought about that conversation with that woman a lot over the years, and I think she was right in a way. Feminism is ultimately not about the rights of women - it is about the extension of socialism. When it is convenient to parade for the extension of socialism under the faux banner of "women's rights" or "equality" or "pro-choice" or whatever 2-3 syllables can be taught to the pressing mob of femtards on a particular day, then feminists will do so. When to insist on their principles will hinder the cause of socialism, however, femtards will back off. Because socialism is their ultimate goal. Not "the rights of women."

This, of course, explains why Bill Clinton, who was alleged to have been a rapist, was the exception to the rule of "women never lie about rape." Because if feminists had insisted that "women never lie about rape" during the Clinton impeachment, it would have hindered the cause of socialism. It also explains why Anthony Weiner is getting a pass....

What exactly has Weiner done that ought to have femtards in a tizzy? Glad you asked.

Now let me first clarify a couple of points - I would NEVER deny that femtards are in a tizzy. Somewhere, you can bet your life on it, feminists ARE IN FACT in a tizzy. In fact, the only strategy of feminism is "tizzy." Like Charlie Sheen, feminists have "only one gear" (unless you count lesbian as a gear, then they have two!), and that gear is "tizzy." Bet your boots on it, feminists are, as we speak, in tizzys the world over.

However, they are not, and will not be, in a tizzy over the antics of Anthony Weiner [unless some heinous crime is revealed, at which point he will have forced their hand, no pun intended]. And I honestly do not think that they should be. But the point is, there are certain things that if the average guy (and only guys, because there are, in fact, two sets of rules) had done JUST AS ANTHONY WEINER had done them, he would currently be experiencing the full wrath of the femtard masses.

Let's postulate for a moment that the CEO of General Electric had done exactly what Weiner has done: "flirted" with random chicks on facebook and twitter, emailed them pics of his erect penis, and engaged in phone sex and dirty hotchat on GE's phones and on GE's time.

"Sexual Harassment" is described as "coercion of a sexual nature... includ[ing] a range of behavior from seemingly mild transgressions and annoyances to actual sexual abuse.... [It is] a form of sexual and psychological abuse and bullying."

Click the above graphic to see a list of the types of situations in which sexual harassment may occur [let me once again remind the reader that I fully recognize that sexual harassment is a fake offense - all that I write about it in this article is merely "for the sake of argument"] and the various personality types of sexual harassers.

First note the following:

  • Where a person is in a position of authority or power over another, due to social status, political power, or age, sexual harassment may occur.
  • Even "friends" and "strangers" can commit sexual harassment.
  • "Adverse affects on the target are common."
  • The harasser may be "totally unaware that his behavior is offensive or constitutes sexual harassment."
  • "Private harassers carefully cultivate a restrained and respectable image on the surface, but when alone their behavior changes.
  • "Dominant harassers... engage in harassing behavior as an ego boost."
Now, let's examine the facts of Weiner's case and see how they stack up against the above.

  • One of Weiner's cyberbabes is now being mocked as having been headed for tabloid scandal since her teen years. Other of his cyberchicks have experienced anxiety, nervousness, and discomfort due to the situation that Weiner put them in.
  • Several of the "targets" claim that they are only online friends or that they have, in fact, never met Weiner.
  • Weiner, a Congressman of some political power and influence, was dealing with women aged 21 and 26 and a single mother who is studying in nursing school (as known now), and with another woman who worked full-time as a blackjack dealer in a Las Vegas casino.
  • Weiner's communication with the women was disrespectful, at one point suggesting that he would have sex with one doggy-style while watching TV and classifying her as a mere "distraction," and self-focused, with constant references to his "fat c*ck" or "ridiculous bulge" with requests to show it off.


It doesn't take long to ruminate and determine that Weiner, in fact, has fulfilled ALL of the aspects of sexual harassment (again, a fake concept) that I have reproduced above. He used his political, social, and age "superiority" to fish for the young or otherwise vulnerable, and the fact that he was merely a "friend" or "stranger" to the women and never actually met them is irrelevant. His gutter flirtations had numerous adverse effects upon the women - from immediate embarrassment to propelling them to get out in front of the story to tell their side first to anxiety to nervousness. Likely, Weiner never intended such adverse circumstances to occur to the women, and may be unaware of their discomfort. Yet his treating them as if they were just holes to be filled for his pleasure while he enjoyed TV or mere "distractions" certainly indicate that it is true, as one of the women said of him, that he "has issues." And apparently, one of the issues is that he considers the female to exist primarily for his enjoyment and pleasure - attitudes that in anyone other than a Democrat politician, feminists would be flooding the airwaves with cries of "SEXISM" about even as we speak.

At least he refrained from the Clintonian cigar trick....

His constant focus on the length and girth of his meat, his desire to expose it, and his need for total strangers to pleasure him certainly indicates that his ego was the primary thing in his own mind. How often, relative to the braggadocio about himself, does he compliment the beauty of the women he is flirting with? And certainly, prior to the infamous mis-tweet, Weiner had cultivated the image of a clean, if raucous, man of the people - even a man who was consumed with advancing feminist issues and making the internet safe from sexual predators.

And darlin,' don't worry - if I can't have you, just a few pics I can "jerk off" to. The very thought of a Jewish girl who can give good head just makes me.... OK, enough of that.


Can you see the same fact pattern applied to the CEO of General Electric?

If you can, I ask you, what would feminists be saying and doing, right now???