So a cop in Florida has developed an iPhone app called "CATE" - Call And Text Eraser. Installed on one's phone, it allows one to carry on adulterous relationships without fear of getting caught by erasing all calls and texts on the phone from certain numbers.
"I had a good friend of mine who went through a divorce because his wife was finding things on his phone. It intercepts call and text messages from people on your lists and stores it within the app."
But then, Immler, the cop who is the inventor of the app, reveals something that says too much by half....
"Immler begs to differ (with those who say his app is an indirect condonation of adultery). He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone."
Now, think about that....
The typical femtard mythology on "domestic violence" (I use quotation marks because, as I have revealed in other posts, the whole concept of domestic violence is fake.) is that men, who are controlled by some evil chemical called "testosterone" and who have been reared to respect violence and non-cooperation as lifestyle choices (after all, men watch football and are competitive... shudder!) and whom society has taught to hate women (because, of course, women are merely nonsentient beings to be controlled and objectified for sexual purposes by the patriarchy!), rise up in all the evolutionary power of their superior strength and beat women senseless for no reason whatsoever.
Now, of course, this mythology doesn't take into account that lawyers who are defending those accused of "domestic violence" across the United States, at least, immediately ask their clients to come up with a list of instances in which the wife (and it is always the wife making the allegation of "domestic violence," isn't it?) was "controlling" or in which the husband/defendant failed to be "controlling," because, as they say in the jurisdictions in which I have knowledge, "All domestic violence proceedings are about 'control,' never about 'violence.'"
But the main point of the mythology, of course, is that women are sainted victims of evil. Evil has been brought about on them by men, the patriarchy, even biology itself (thank God/goddess/Gaia for abortion!). But women are as pure and unsullied as the wind driven snow, and didn't do anything to bring about "domestic violence" (whether that is defined as assault - which it isn't - or merely refusing to give a woman her way - which it is).
But here is an amazing thing. The cop who designed the app says he designed it to deter "domestic violence" (however you define that) because it is prone to happen... when adultery is at issue?
Let's read it again....
"Immler begs to differ (with those who say his app is an indirect condonation of adultery). He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone."
Now waitaminnit... lemme get this straight. Women file 98% of all "domestic violence" (however you define that) claims in the United States. Yet Barney Fife/App Developer here says that "domestic violence" (however you define that) is sparked by the discovery that a spouse is cheating?
So DV (however you define that) is something uniquely complained of by women. DV (however you define that) occurs, according to Mr. Adam 12, when complainants are discovered in adultery. So it must be that women are somehow uniquely related to adultery...?
Ergo, the reason "domestic violence" (however you define that) takes place is: Women are Whores.
Oddly, the story itself dds further fuel to this suspicion when it notes that this app, which is designed to help one cover one's tracks while committing adultery... is primarily downloaded by women!
I think we have stumbled upon a very important solution to the "domestic violence" (however you define that) problem in this country! If women would quit being such irredeemable and committed whores, "domestic violence" (however you define that) would go away!
Let's see if feminists are really interested in wiping out "domestic violence" (however you define that), or if they just want to keep the funding that flows from all the false allegations of "domestic violence" (however you define that).
I think I know how this story ends.
____________
Original story from WPTV.com....
by Rochelle Ritchie
It comes in the form of an app on your cell phone that can hide who you've been texting and calling.
The app, called "CATE," hit the Android market last week and is already getting rave reviews. But one divorce attorney says the app may keep your secrets secret, but not for long.
CATE stands for "call and text eraser" which is exactly what it does. The app erases any opportunity for your significant other to find out who you've been in contact with.
Phillip Immler is a cop who is also in law school. He created the app after a friend's phone was hacked by his spouse.
"I had a good friend of mine who went through a divorce because his wife was finding things on his phone. It intercepts call and text messages from people on your lists and stores it within the app," says Immler.
Only the app owner has the passcode to unlock the contacts he or she decides should be hidden from view. There's already buzz over the app online.
Divorce attorney Robin Roshkind says while the app may promise to hide your infidelity, it won't stop a determined woman or man wanting to know the truth.
"If there is going to be an app to stop all this, trust me, we still have our ways, a good old fashioned private investigator. It's a little ironic it was an officer of the law that came up with this app," says Roshkind.
But Immler begs to differ. He says on patrol he is called to a number of domestic violence situations sparked by what is seen on a cell phone.
So far "CATE" has been downloaded more than 20 times in its first week at $2.99 a pop.
Despite the purpose of his app, Immler insists, "I don't condone cheating, no."
Immler says more women have purchased the app than men.
I'm not familiar with the status of domestic violence claims and whether most of those cases involve actual violence. I've read your post on the matter, and if what you say is true, it's very unfortunate. I certainly hope things are different here in Canada (although I doubt it, since our society is not only feminist but feminized, unlike America, much of whose "female-as-victim" ethos is promoted by the innocent and well-meaning male protective instinct towards women.)
ReplyDeleteHowever, I would like to point out that adultery, or even being "an irredeemable whore", is not an excuse to commit violence against someone. Violence is justified against someone who is threatening your life or your property -- not your "honour", reputation or feelings.
You'll also notice that the app was originally inspired by a man whose adultery was discovered by his wife.
Wow, great catch!
ReplyDelete@Anonymousabove I think the point of the article is not that a person is "excused" for committing DV because someone else commits adultery, but that women are not the pristine and innocent victims that they are presented as being by feminists.
ReplyDeleteBut I do have this one question: which is worse? To commit adultery, resulting in the destruction of one's own reputation, someone else's marriage, your own spouse, and the lives of your children? Or to commit a single act of violence from which someone recovers in a few days?
If I had to choose between the healing of a broken bone and having the rest of my life, and my children's lives, uprooted and ruined by a spouse's adultery... well, I had a broken bone when I was a kid. It hurt. But I am over it now.